A digitised version of ICSF library, with more than 2000 original documents and 12,000+ curated links, collected over the last 33 years The International Collective in Support of Fishworkers (ICSF) is an international non-governmental organization that works towards the establishment of equitable, gender-just,self-reliant and sustainable fisheries, particularly in the small-scale, artisanal sector.
Search
as

Testing best practices in small scale fisheries management: Evidence from a collaborative intervention in two marine protected areas of the central Mediterranean Sea

Zampardi, Serena and Scianna, Claudia and Calo, Antonio and Hogg, Katie and Ranu, Marco and Aglieri, Giorgio and Meglio, Emanuela Di and Mangano, Maria Cristina and Prato, Giulia and Romeo, Teresa and Colloca, Francesco and Milisenda, Giacomo and Franco, Antonio Di (2024) Testing best practices in small scale fisheries management: Evidence from a collaborative intervention in two marine protected areas of the central Mediterranean Sea. Ocean & Coastal Management, 258.

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)
Official URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/...

Abstract

Adopting best practices (BPs) in small scale fisheries (SSF) is generally acknowledged to enhance ecological and social conditions, improving SSF management overall. Yet studies that empirically assess the effects of BPs on social-ecological outcomes (e.g., fishers' catches, revenues, and level of support towards management measures) remain limited. This study aimed to assess the effects of adopting BPs on catch per unit of effort (CPUE), revenue per unit of effort (RPUE) and small-scale fishers' perceptions in two Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) in Campania, Italy (Santa Maria di Castellabate (CAS-MPA) and Regno di Nettuno (NET-MPA)). Two BPs were implemented and tested in the two MPAs: i) five selective gears with three different mesh/hook sizes and ii) a participatory approach to increase dialogue between fishers and managers. The results from 36 surveys with small scale fishers and 158 SSF operations monitored using photo-sampling and image analysis techniques (between 2020 and 2022) are presented. Analyses of landings showed that significant differences in CPUE and RPUE between mesh/hook sizes were found in a limited number of cases (i.e., combination of fishing gears used in the 2 MPAs). Significant but divergent effects were found on CPUE in the two MPAs for gillnet used to target amberjack (GNA) only. RPUE was significantly higher in the NET-MPA when adopting the largest mesh size for GNA and the largest hook size for bottom longlines (BLL). When analyzing perceptions, fishers generally reported that the BPs adopted had a positive impact on their revenues, improved their relationship with MPA managers and increased their support for the MPA. In addition, eight stakeholder focus groups were held which helped investigators better understand the context, feedback the data gathered from the research and open up dialogue between the relevant stakeholders. The study concluded that increasing mesh/hook sizes, within the range tested here, does not negatively impact fishers’ revenues, while likely improving the status of target populations. Moreover, increasing dialogue between fishers and decision-makers can generate more positive perceptions towards the MPA and improve mutual understanding, helping to reconcile biodiversity conservation with human wellbeing for SSF.

Item Type: Articles
Keywords: Small-scale Fisheries, Fisheries Management, Marine Protected Area (MPA), Mediterranean Sea, Catch Per Unit of Effort (CPUE), Revenue Per Unit of Effort (RPUE), Fishing Gears, Biodiversity, Conservation
Subjects: Biodiversity
Depositing User: Kokila ICSF Krish
Date Deposited: 09 Jan 2025 10:10
Last Modified: 09 Jan 2025 10:10
URI: http://icsfarchives.net/id/eprint/21428

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item