Datta, Samar K. and Nilakantan, Rahul Evolving India's strategies for the global debate on fisheries subsidies. UNSPECIFIED.
Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)Abstract
This paper attempts to resolve two issues: 1) whether the coverage of subsidies ought to be limited to the currently available only legal definition of direct or indirect government financial transfer as provided by the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (ASCM) together with its traditional emphasis on traffic light approach, or should it target a more comprehensive definition as advised by FAO to include implicit subsidies too, which also confer benefits to fishers and their enterprises due to gove nment non-financial actions (e.g., supply of RD, regulation, etc.) or inactions/inadequate actions (e.g., in the enforcement of measures to prevent water pollution, bio-diversity loss etc). 2) the second issue pertains to non-transparency, non-availability and hence non-comparability of data and information across countries.
| Item Type: | Documents |
|---|---|
| Class Number: | 400.EVO002 |
| Keywords: | India, Fisheries Subsidies, WTO, Trade, OECD, Negotiations, SCM |
| Subjects: | Fisheries Trade |
| Depositing User: | Chitti Babu ICSF |
| Date Deposited: | 16 Feb 2022 05:35 |
| Last Modified: | 16 Feb 2022 05:35 |
| URI: | http://icsfarchives.net/id/eprint/8777 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
